STEPHEN A SMITH SAYS AMERICANS SHOULD NOT CARE ABOUT THE EPSTEIN FILES ANYMORE: REPORT

On a recent appearance on NewsNation, sports commentator Stephen A. Smith sparked controversy by asserting that Americans should not care about the Jeffrey Epstein files, despite acknowledging their likely existence. His remarks, made during a discussion about the ongoing fascination with Epstein’s documents, have reignited debate about the significance of the files and their relevance to the public. This article examines Smith’s comments, the context of his NewsNation appearance, and the implications of his stance on a case that continues to captivate and polarize.

Smith’s Comments on NewsNation

During his NewsNation segment on July 10, 2025, Smith addressed the persistent public interest in the Epstein files—documents tied to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in 2019. These files, which include court records, flight logs, and other materials, are believed by some to hold evidence of a network of powerful individuals linked to Epstein’s illicit activities. Smith, however, dismissed their importance, stating, “I could give a d*mn about the Epstein client list. It ain’t gonna change my life or the lives of most Americans. We’ve got bills to pay and families to feed.”

Smith went on to argue that the majority of Americans—hundreds of millions, by his estimate—are indifferent to the files because they have no direct bearing on their daily struggles. “I believe the files are probably real, but what’s it gonna do for us? Are we gonna stop working, stop living? It’s not like it’s gonna fix inflation or the Texas floods,” he said, referencing recent economic and environmental challenges. His comments echoed sentiments expressed by former President Donald Trump, who recently called Epstein a “creep” and questioned the ongoing obsession with the files during a Cabinet meeting.

Smith’s blunt dismissal was framed as a reflection of the average American’s priorities, emphasizing practicality over what he views as an elite scandal. However, his acknowledgment that the files likely exist added complexity to his stance, raising questions about why he believes their contents are irrelevant.

The Context of the Epstein Files

The Epstein files have been a focal point of public intrigue since Epstein’s arrest and subsequent death, which was officially ruled a suicide by the Justice Department. On July 8, 2025, the Department released a memo stating that no “client list” or evidence of blackmail exists, a finding that disappointed those expecting revelations about high-profile figures like Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, or Trump, all of whom have been linked to Epstein in various capacities. Despite this, speculation persists, fueled by conspiracy theories and distrust in official narratives.

Smith’s NewsNation comments came at a time when public discourse around the files was intensifying, particularly on platforms like X, where users like @JasonJournoDC and @TheCalvinCooli1 noted Smith’s alignment with Trump’s frustration. Others, such as @Vision4theBlind, accused Smith of downplaying a serious issue, with some labeling him a “sellout” for dismissing the pursuit of justice for Epstein’s victims. The polarized reactions reflect the broader divide between those who see the files as a key to exposing systemic corruption and those, like Smith, who view them as a distraction.

Why Smith Thinks Americans Shouldn’t Care

Smith’s argument hinges on the idea that the Epstein files, while potentially real, are disconnected from the immediate concerns of most Americans. His NewsNation remarks emphasized economic pressures, such as inflation and job security, and practical responsibilities, like family obligations, as far more pressing than a scandal involving elites. “I’m not saying it’s not important to some people, but let’s be real—most folks are trying to survive, not chase conspiracies,” he said.

This perspective aligns with Smith’s broader persona as a commentator who prioritizes relatability. Known for his fiery takes on sports and culture, Smith often frames issues through the lens of everyday struggles, appealing to a wide audience. By downplaying the Epstein files, he may be attempting to resonate with viewers who feel overwhelmed by political scandals and disconnected from the world of high-profile figures.

Additionally, Smith’s comments reflect a broader societal fatigue with unresolved controversies. The Epstein case, with its mix of verified facts and rampant speculation, has fueled endless debates, from QAnon theories to claims of a government cover-up. The Justice Department’s recent findings have done little to quell these discussions, as evidenced by reactions from figures like Alex Jones and Marjorie Taylor Greene on X. Smith’s indifference may appeal to those exhausted by the lack of concrete answers.

The Controversy Surrounding Smith’s Stance

Smith’s remarks have drawn significant criticism, particularly from those who believe the Epstein files could expose systemic abuse and hold powerful individuals accountable. The incarceration of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s associate, for 20 years underscores the severity of the crimes, and many argue that uncovering other accomplices is a matter of justice for victims. Critics, such as @ShadowofEzra on X, have accused Smith of trivializing a serious issue, with some questioning whether his stance reflects pressure to align with certain narratives.

Smith’s alignment with Trump’s dismissal of the files has also raised eyebrows, given the political sensitivity of the Epstein case. Trump’s own documented interactions with Epstein, including flights on his private plane, have fueled speculation, and figures like Rep. Jamie Raskin have called for the release of any files mentioning Trump. By echoing Trump’s frustration, Smith risks alienating viewers who see the files as a critical piece of the puzzle in understanding elite misconduct.

Moreover, Smith’s acknowledgment that the files likely exist complicates his argument. If the files contain evidence of wrongdoing by influential figures, dismissing them as irrelevant could be seen as undermining accountability. This tension highlights the challenge of balancing public interest in transparency with the practical concerns Smith emphasizes.

Broader Implications

Smith’s NewsNation comments underscore a key question: how much do elite scandals matter to the average person? His argument that the Epstein files are irrelevant to most Americans may resonate with those focused on immediate challenges, but it overlooks the symbolic importance of addressing systemic abuse. The Epstein case touches on issues of power, privilege, and justice—issues that shape public trust in institutions, even if they don’t directly affect daily life.

Furthermore, Smith’s stance reflects the complexities of navigating public discourse in an era of polarized media and misinformation. By dismissing the files, he may inadvertently fuel perceptions that he’s downplaying accountability, particularly given Epstein’s connections to prominent figures. At the same time, his focus on practicality highlights the disconnect between elite scandals and the lived experiences of many Americans.

Stephen A. Smith’s NewsNation comments dismissing the Epstein files, while acknowledging their likely existence, reflect a pragmatic but divisive perspective. By arguing that the files are irrelevant to most Americans’ lives, Smith aligns himself with those who prioritize everyday concerns over high-profile scandals. However, his stance has sparked criticism for minimizing the pursuit of justice and transparency in a case that continues to captivate the public. As the debate over the Epstein files persists, Smith’s remarks highlight the tension between practicality and the demand for accountability in a polarized world.